中文
我國因應福島第一核電廠 ALPS 處理水排放案之赴日專家觀察團報告
[備份] 我國因應福島第一核電廠 ALPS 處理水排放案之赴日專家觀察團報告
這篇應該可以解答很多人的疑惑
英文
TEPCO Draft Study Responding to the Subcommittee Report on Handling ALPS Treated Water
[備份] TEPCO Draft Study Responding to the Subcommittee Report on Handling ALPS Treated Water
提到汽化的技術
Pre-discharge Analysis Results of ALPS Treated Water in the Measurement/Confirmation Tanks
[備份] Pre-discharge Analysis Results of ALPS Treated Water in the Measurement/Confirmation Tanks
The Subcommittee on Handling of the ALPS Treated Water Report
[備份] The Subcommittee on Handling of the ALPS Treated Water Report
成本就是從這份文件出來的
IAEA Review of Safety Related Aspects of Handling ALPS-Treated Water at TEPCO’s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station
[備份] IAEA Review of Safety Related Aspects of Handling ALPS-Treated Water at TEPCO’s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station
五個實驗室的監測數據
網友
連頌恩
筆記
- “我想東電的reputation 就是無可懷疑的缺乏信賴感”
是，我也不信賴東電本身。所以其數據自然是要有其他方驗證才有參考性。而這其他方驗證下面敘述 - “IAEA甚至無法背書檢驗結果…”
否。IAEA表示:根據綜合評估，IAEA得出的結論是，日本採取的ALPS處理水排放方法和活動符合相關國際安全標準。
Based on its comprehensive assessment, the IAEA has concluded that the approach and activities to the discharge of ALPS treated water taken by Japan are consistent with relevant international safety standards,[1]
3.”…只能從檢驗報告上字面解釋放行，沒有尋求第三方認證，也刻意不規劃。””IAEA一開始就說明了，試驗不是他們做的，它們僅就結果數字上解讀。”
否。IAEA安全報告說明[2]，IAEA對於水與環境監控的事項為:審查取樣與分析方法；驗證東電的處理水樣數據；驗證東電與日本政府的環境檢測數據。而後兩項的驗證方法是透過實驗室比較來進行。(節錄於4-1)
The IAEA corroboration of source and environmental monitoring related to discharges of ALPS treated water from FDNPS is comprised of three distinct elements (see also Figure 4.1):
•Review of sampling and analytical methods for source and environmental monitoring related to ALPS treated water at FDNPS used by TEPCO and relevant Japanese authorities.
•Corroboration of source monitoring undertaken by TEPCO, including a comprehensive radiological characterization of ALPS treated water samples.
•Corroboration of environmental monitoring undertaken by TEPCO and relevant Japanese authorities
The corroboration of source and environmental monitoring will be based on interlaboratory comparisons (ILCs). …
所以IAEA的角色是審核取樣與分析方法，與組織實驗室驗證來驗證東電的檢測數據。
而且這些驗證是包含IAEA自己的實驗室與第三方實驗室(實驗室清單自行查閱報告)
The IAEA will involve several of its own laboratories and third-party laboratories as part of these corroboration activities. …
另，為避免有人說是東電取樣有作弊之嫌，或是只看東電數字。節錄IAEA說明佐證:2022 年 10 月，原子能機構見證了另外兩批 ALPS 處理水樣本的採集。 2022年11月IAEA的TERC實驗室以及韓國的KINS實驗室接收到樣本
In October 2022, the IAEA witnessed the collection of two additional batches of samples of ALPS treated water. …
The IAEA’s samples were received by TERC in November 2022. KINS also received its samples in in November 2022. …
環境取樣，節錄IAEA說明:這些樣本將被分割，子樣本將提供給參與ILC的實驗室，用於分析一系列相關放射性核素的活度濃度。
These samples will be split, and sub-samples will be provided to the laboratories participating in the ILCs for the analysis ofthe activity concentrations of a range of relevant radionuclides.
4.”但是因為第三方是誰 也是大家存疑的地方””誰? 這不是走到哪 找到哪?”
否。IAEA歷來在報告裡面都會明確提到該次ILC參與者。例如在Interlaboratory Comparisons 2017–2020: Determination of Radionuclides in Sea Water, Sediment and Fish[3]就有明確指出參與ILC的15個單位。
而這次報告[2]也不例外。第一次的ILC是
- Spiez Laboratory (LS – Labor Spiez), Switzerland
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), France
- Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), United States of America
- Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety (KINS), Republic of Korea
甚至第二第三次ILC的參與者也有提到
As well as TEPCO and the IAEA laboratories, the ALMERA laboratory Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety (KINS) will participate in these ILCs.
而ILC的參與對象資格也有寫明
Under the coordination of the participating IAEA laboratories, selected third-party laboratories, members of the network of Analytical Laboratories for the Measurement of Environmental Radioactivity (ALMERA) with demonstrable competence in the methods required, are also conducting analyses of samples as participants in the ILCs.
所以第三方參與的部分既載明在報告內，且有明確的規劃。第二、三次的ILC參與者也是已知。
5.”一般工程進行，都會有施作方，檢驗單位/驗證單位，顧問單位來指導工作(或採樣)的方向”
綜上所述，如果按你這段話來比喻，工程(處理水排放)施作方是東電，IAEA屬於顧問單位(審核採樣與分析方法)與檢驗/驗證單位(下轄實驗室驗證)，另外還有其他的第三方實驗室為第三檢驗/驗證單位。符合你此段話之論述。
https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/iaea-finds-japans-plans-to-release-treated-water-into-the-sea-at-fukushima-consistent-with-international-safety-standards - https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/iaea_comprehensive_alps_report.pdf
- https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/AQ-67web.pdf